The historic visit today of Barack Obamato La Paz and the dedication of the Cesar Chavez monument as a nationalhistoric site is important. It iscovered in many news stories, including here: http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/The-Vote/2012/1008/In-dedicating-Cesar-Chavez-monument-Obama-reaches-out-to-Latino-votersUnfortunately the writer AmandaPaulson is poorly informed on therole of Chavez and the UFW on immigration. She repeats the right wing view that Chavez was antiimmigrant. Nothing could befurther from the truth. Both CNN and USA Today cover thededication today. Among the more contested issuesraised by Paulson and by Barnacke in Trampling Out the Vintage, is the view of the UFW’s relationships withundocumented workers in 1975 period, the so called “Wet Line. This is the same argumentbeing made today by various anti immigrant militia groups , TeaParty advocates and posted onWikipedia . I tried for a couple of weeks to correct the Wikipedia source butothers regularly changed it back. The post cites sources, but the sources only acknowledge a conflict,they do not support the assertion of anti immigrant behavior.
Chavezwas not anti immigrant. Indeed,from its founding the UFW was an organization that worked to improve the livesof immigrants, providing education, immigration counseling, and organizing. Helping workers toget legal status was a major part of the work. The case cited was not about immigrants, it was about strikebreakers.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder