13 Ekim 2012 Cumartesi

Immigration: Facts on Immigration from the NYT Bill Keller

To contact us Click HERE
While I don't agree with everything Keller says in todays article in the NYT - he is clear about the impact of immigration on the U.S.  He says that Newt Gingrich's ideas on immigration are actually the best he has seen recently.  We do agree on the terrifying idea of a Gingrich presidential candidacy.

As he rightly says - immigration brings out the nasty side of many who are already here -

MTH
-------------------------


Op-Ed Columnist

The Good Newt



Immigration is a subject that brings out the best and the worst in Americans...
As it is practiced in our politics, the subject often dredges up darker feelings: tribalism, xenophobia, envy, a pull-up-the-ladder stinginess. This is not new. The English and Dutch colonists resented the immigrant waves of Irish and Germans, who resented the later waves of Italians and Poles and Jews. Polls show that Americans only halfheartedly support immigration, and less than halfheartedly in hard times...
...immigration is a rejuvenation of our economy, a source of invention and investment at the high end and of tax-paying, productive labor at the low end. So the foundation of a new policy should be the opening of more, and more-efficient, legal channels for the newcomers who will refresh our ingenuity and replenish our aging work force (and, by the way, pay to keep the Social Security funds filled for boomers like me)...
The most scrupulous study I’ve seen of the economic impact of illegal immigration — by Gordon Hanson, an economist at the University of California, San Diego — weighed the costs to society (schools, health care, etc.) against the benefits (tax revenues, labor productivity, etc.) and concluded that the difference was “close enough to zero to be essentially a wash.” The idea that illegal immigrants are dragging down the economy is just wrong...for complete article    
  

Education: Why do kids fail in school?

To contact us Click HERE

Speaking more than one language raises IQ and prevents Alzheimers.  Yet I still see education majors saying that bilingualism keeps kids from learning.  The truth is that its really an issue of social class.  Ladd and Fiske lay it out below.
While I was a graduate student at Rice University a decade ago I saw a group of undergraduate students that had traveled all over the world, done study abroad, had long stays at summer camp, and had taken all sorts of music and art lessons.  These are the privileged few.  Yet that is our standard for excellence.  To open the gate to a superb college education our children need to have these numerous advantages.  The reality is that most American children - no matter what race or ethnic group - don't have these experiences - only a few families have the economic ability to send their kids to live in France for a year.
Many more don't even have the regular advantage of having parents who have enough time to have long and rich conversations.  The kids also don't go to schools that offer the education and stimulation they need to succeed. 
Its not immigration, or parents who refuse to speak English at home.  Its the economy and our own moral handicap that prevents us from offering what all children need.
MTH
-------------------------------
Op-Ed Contributors

Class Matters. Why Won’t We Admit It?



Durham, N.C.

NO one seriously disputes the fact that students from disadvantaged households perform less well in school, on average, than their peers from more advantaged backgrounds. But rather than confront this fact of life head-on, our policy makers mistakenly continue to reason that, since they cannot change the backgrounds of students, they should focus on things they can control...      

International research tells the same story. Results of the 2009 reading tests conducted by the Program for International Student Assessment show that, among 15-year-olds in the United States and the 13 countries whose students outperformed ours, students with lower economic and social status had far lower test scores than their more advantaged counterparts within every country. Can anyone credibly believe that the mediocre overall performance of American students on international tests is unrelated to the fact that one-fifth of American children live in poverty?..
      
Large bodies of research have shown how poor health and nutrition inhibit child development and learning and, conversely, how high-quality early childhood and preschool education programs can enhance them. We understand the importance of early exposure to rich language on future cognitive development. We know that low-income students experience greater learning loss during the summer when their more privileged peers are enjoying travel and other enriching activities.      


 Yes, we need to make sure that all children, and particularly disadvantaged children, have access to good schools, as defined by the quality of teachers and principals and of internal policies and practices.

But let’s not pretend that family background does not matter and can be overlooked. Let’s agree that we know a lot about how to address the ways in which poverty undermines student learning. Whether we choose to face up to that reality is ultimately a moral question...for complete article  

Civil Liberties: S. 1867 will take away Due Process - a fundamental aspect of American Democracy

To contact us Click HERE

Some of you may remember studying the Magna Carta while in high school.  I am not sure it is such an important document these days.  Apparently many members of Congress don't seem to know about one of its most important concepts - the Right of Due Process.
The concern about S. 1987 the 2011 Defense Authorization Act is that Due Process for U.S. citizens will be lost.  See the definition below of Due Process.


Click HERE for the complete text of S. 1867 as passed by the U.S. Senate on Dec. 2, 2011.
MTH
------------------------------------------From the Encyclopedia of Governance:  
Due process is a legal concept referring to the guarantee that a government will follow fair procedures when depriving a person of life, liberty, or property. A key element of the rule of law is the idea that government must follow written guidelines that restrict the actions it can take against individuals. Due process suggests that an established set of uniform legal procedures will be used to ensure a just outcome, as opposed to arbitrary or individualized judgment. The most basic level of due process includes individuals' rights to be notified of charges against them, to speak in their own defense, and to be judged by a jury of their peers. It also includes the right to just compensation for the seizure of property and public disclosure of relevant laws.
Due process is a long-standing concept in the Anglo-American legal tradition, originating from the British Magna Carta of 1215. Today, many nations have some form of due process protected by their constitutions. In the United States, due process is guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment, which refers to the federal government, and Fourteenth Amendment, which applies to the states and was passed after the Civil War.
----------------------------------------
Op-Ed Contributors

New York Times - Guantánamo Forever?



IN his inaugural address, President Obama called on us to “reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals.” We agree. Now, to protect both, he must veto the National Defense Authorization Act that Congress is expected to pass this week....

...One provision would authorize the military to indefinitely detain without charge people suspected of involvement with terrorism, including United States citizens apprehended on American soil. Due process would be a thing of the past...

...a second provision would mandate military custody for most terrorism suspects. It would force on the military responsibilities it hasn’t sought. This would violate not only the spirit of the post-Reconstruction act limiting the use of the armed forces for domestic law enforcement but also our trust with service members...

...A third provision would further extend a ban on transfers from Guantánamo, ensuring that this morally and financially expensive symbol of detainee abuse will remain open well into the future...link to complete article

Related News

  • Senate Approves Requiring Military Custody in Terror Cases(November 30, 2011)
  • Times Topic:Detainees

Related in Opinion

  • Editorial: Hobbling the Fight Against Terrorism(December 8, 2011) 

Immigration: Perry likes Arpaio, the Department of Justice doesn't

To contact us Click HERE
It is inconceivable that Texas Gov. Rick Perry would ally himself with Sheriff Arpaio just before a damning report on how Arpaio mistreats his inmates.

Click HERE for the Department of Justice report

HERE for the Department of Justice report in Spanish

-----------------
Pattern of civil rights abuses alleged in Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Maricopa County - LA Times

The Justice Department charges that Latinos were illegally arrested and abused in jail repeatedly in the Arizona county and that hundreds of sexual assaults weren't investigated.


---------------
Rick Perry turns to Joe Arpaio on Immigration Issue - LA Times
Texas Gov. Rick Perry had hoped to assuage concerns about his views on illegal immigration by winning the backing of tough-talking Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Ariz.

San Antonio Military Base Used as Children's Shelter

To contact us Click HERE
Due to an increase in the number of unaccompanied minors crossing the border into the U.S., a San Antonio Air Force base has been turned into a shelter to house the children.  According to the article below, the majority of the children are from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras.  A smaller number of the children are from Mexico.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/18/immigrant-children-air-force-base-shelter_n_1431584.html?1334749309&ref=latino-voices

12 Ekim 2012 Cuma

Bret Baier Slams Stephanie Cutter Over Politicizing Libya Terrorist Attack

To contact us Click HERE
At Gateway Pundit, "BLOWOUT!… Obama Spokesperson Stephanie Cutter & Bret Baier Clash on FOX (Video)."

Expect more of this as the Obama campaign unravels.

Four Americans were murdered – Including the US Ambassador in the 9-11 massacre.

The Obama Administration blamed it on a YouTube video – a lie.
Also at Hot Air, "Video: Bret Baier grills Stephanie Cutter on her Benghazi comments."

I'M AN IMMIGRANT TOO!

To contact us Click HERE
On a recent trip to Philadelphia, I had the privilege of visiting four Catholic campuses on immigration issues:  Villanova University, St. Joseph's University, La Salle University, and Cabrini College.  I am both impressed and inspired with the faculty and students as they help educate about our immigrant brothers and sisters, and how they are reaching out to them in the greater Philadelphia area.

At Cabrini College I attended a large gathering to give my power point presentation on immigration issues.  A young lady gave an opening reflection, and I was truly impressed.  With her permission I am reprinting it here for you--it is truly insightful and powerful.


I'm an immigrant but not like you think.  You're one too and I'm about to tell you how.

These are the things people characterize an immigrant as:

     *  how you sound

     *  the language you speak

     *  what you don't know

     *  your mannerisms, and

     *  the questions you may ask.

You're an immigrant too.  Listen close because I'm about to tell you how.

Remember your first day in a new place?

Whether it be college, work or even a new face?

You come to a foreign land, and new country and eventually want to be loved.

Am I wrong?

You expect that over time you will be accepted and that this foreign country won't be one anymore.

That your face won't be a new one but one that's become a part of.

You're an immigrant too, listen close because I already told you.

When you say immigrant it should hit home, no matter where your home lies.

Don't look across the border for someone to sympathize with.

Look in your own eyes and realize you long for that very same prize.

That your face won't be a new one but one that's become a part of.

A part of a melting pot of culture that we all have a piece of in us.

We can't deny someone else our warm embrace only because they have a different face.

Think of immigration as your own immigration.

Jenay M. Smith

San Antonio Military Base Used as Children's Shelter

To contact us Click HERE
Due to an increase in the number of unaccompanied minors crossing the border into the U.S., a San Antonio Air Force base has been turned into a shelter to house the children.  According to the article below, the majority of the children are from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras.  A smaller number of the children are from Mexico.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/18/immigrant-children-air-force-base-shelter_n_1431584.html?1334749309&ref=latino-voices

Becoming Legal: An Immigrant's Path to Citizenship

To contact us Click HERE
A short course on immigration in the USA:

1.  Anti-immigrant sentiment is nothing new nor limited to our current affairs or just the U.S.:  all over the world immigrants are shunned and the outside ethnic group is always seen as inferior.  Just a few which come to mind:  Shiite and Sunni,  Japanese and Chinese, Kurds and Turks, Slavs and Croats, Romanians in Spain ( the Spanish gov. recently was offering them money to go back to Romania, if they promised to stay there for 5 yrs ! ), Catholic Irish vs. English Protestants, the Algerians in France etc.  In the US we have historically found groups that were easy to discriminate against:  Native Americans, Italians, Germans, Irish, Chinese, Japanese, Africans, and now Latinos.
    2. There is always an element of "otherness" commonly based on religion or skin color or language in the "outside" group.    3.  Those in a position of influence ( talk show hosts, politicians, religious leaders, and in some cases even teachers) tend to take sides.  Those who exacerbate the dislike of the scapegoat, usually focus on the "otherness" and try to foment fear of the unknown.  Most people naturally have certain fears of that which is outside their comfort zone, their realm of familiarity.  So, this is an easy way to persuade the populace of the demons in "those people."   We hear terms like "the axis of evil," and "They are either for us, or against us." or "They are taking away our jobs."  This is a common one in our current financially stressful world.    4.  With the passage of time, at least in the US, our "social mind-set" or popular image softens toward many of our formerly disliked groups.  Think of the changes we have seen in attitudes in our lifetime toward, say, African Americans, Japanese, and the Vietnamese.  These changes come slowly, with influence makers and moms in sneakers speaking out.     5.  Seeing the above pattern repeat itself several times in our lives, we now are much more skeptical of accepting the initial demagoguery.    6.  Based on our own experiences and observations, we have found the hispanics we have met here in the US and Latin America, mostly genuine, generous, hard-working people, who are trying to make the best of their lives.  The newly emigrated are leaving poverty, violence and corruption, looking for a new beginning, a second chance.  When we recently read in an internet forum a comment from a woman who described herself as a conservative, born again Christian who thought that all Mexicans should be deported, what came to mind was that the essence of both Christianity and immigration is a second chance, a new beginning, an opportunity to start fresh.  She obviously saw life differently from us.
    7.  Attempts to force immigrants out of our communities have repeatedly proven unworkable.  The resulting economic impact is disastrous to those on both sides of the tracks.  The citizen farmers and small business owners find themselves without customers and workers.  The immigrants, both legal and illegal, have their lives and families thrown into chaos.  For some, this may be the goal.  For us, it is unfathomable.    8.  So, indeed, we would favor changing our laws to provide a path to citizenship.  Perhaps fines may be a part of the equation, but few will be able to pay them.  If it is found that back taxes are owed, certainly employers would be required to pay their portions, along with penalties and interest.  We think that it will be nearly impossible to find small business employers who have relied in the past on undocumented workers, now willing to step up and pay these back taxes, fines and interest.  Hence, "making up for the past" is a difficult part of the solution.  Criminal records should be examined and not allowed for violent crimes.  Service to the country (USA) in the form of work in the Peace Corps, Americorps etc would be a good thing.  Basic English proficiency should be required, as well as knowledge of our governmental system.  We see this not as amnesty.  Rather it represents a means of earning a way into our system.  In the early days of our country, many people earned their way in - as indentured servants.  When they could not pay for their passage across the ocean, they "borrowed" the money from a landowner already living in this country, then worked for that owner for five to seven years without pay.  Hence, working to achieve legal status and citizenship in the US is nothing new.

Alabama's Attorney General makes claims about "Illegal Aliens"

To contact us Click HERE

Alabama Attorney General, Luther Strange, testifying before Congress. Photo by lutherstrange.

Excerpts from the Immigration Impact by Wendy Sefsaf
Oct 12, 2011

 CLAIM:     Yesterday, Alabama’s Attorney General claimed that “illegal aliens” make up a substantial portion of the state’s prison population.
   FACT:   Alabama's prison population: 31,000  --   182 of which are currently subject to deportation based on holds placed by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.  That is about 1/2 of one percent.

    CLAIM:     Yesterday, Alabama’s Attorney General claimed “many of these people are taking jobs away from United States citizens."
     FACT:         Alabamas unemployment rate hovers around 10%.   To say that one undocumented worker fired is one documented worker hired might be politically expedient, but the research actually shows just the opposite. Undocumented workers tend to have different skills, education, and experience levels than native-born workers. In fact, if a 1 to 1 worker replacement was the answer, why is the Governor considering using the prison population to alleviate a severe worker shortage on Alabama farms? Where are all those unemployed Americans waiting to work in the fields?

   CLAIM:     The Alabama’s Attorney General claims there are "difficulties in collecting taxes from these persons ["illegal aliens"], many of whom work off the books, means that many of them are utilizing Alabama’s public resources without paying their fair share.”
    FACT:      According to the Institute on Tax and Economic Policy, undocumented immigrants in Alabama pay $25 million in income taxes, $5.8 million in property taxes, and $98 million in sales taxes, for a total contribution of more than $130 million.

 The actual costs to Alabama’s economy have yet to be determined, and no real estimates have been provided by the lawmakers behind HB56. It has always been the case that estimating the costs and contributions of unauthorized immigrants is not an exact science. But Alabama is about to make it a bit easier. No longer will losing your undocumented population be an abstract proposition. In Alabama it’s about to be a reality, and with it the economic ramifications of a mass exodus of workers, consumers, and taxpayers from an already struggling state economy.

See more from the source:  http://immigrationimpact.com/2011/10/12/the-facts-and-numbers-don%e2%80%99t-matter-in-alabama/

11 Ekim 2012 Perşembe

Diary: A Vehicle that Takes People Away

To contact us Click HERE
Yesterday I was at the intersection of Houston's S.W. Freeway feeder (also known as U.S. 59) and Hillcroft St.  As I was waiting for the light I noticed the license plates of the vehicle in front of me.  It wasn't like the one I have - a plate with bright red letters that say University of Houston Cougars.  It said U.S. Government, DHS.  The white van was brand new - kind of sleek looking, with some black trim. It had no letters on the doors, just a small DHS seal at the left front.  The windows were tinted, even the front windshield (I thought that against the law).  Yet as I peered into the back window I could see a cage like barrier.  I realized that this van was used to transport people to detention centers.  Moving to the lane on the left so I could make a u-turn - I passed the van on its left side and unsuccessfully tried to see the face of the driver.  The window was tinted too dark to see much of anything except his/her left arm.

A feeling of sadness came over me.  I thought of the people who have been taken away, the DREAMers who have been deported.  The hundreds of thousands that Obama has sent away since he became president.  I wondered how our country, said to be established on the basis of a Bill of Rights could allow such a thing.  For a moment I forgot that most of the Founding Fathers were slave owners.  In 1850 carts were used to haul away runaway or disruptive slaves.  Today sleek new vans are used to remove people who don't have the right type of permission to be in this country.  Never mind that the numbers of those who can legally come here is strikingly small;  never mind that if you have a few hundred thousand dollars you can immigrate easily.

MTH




Immigration: Part of Alabama Anti-Immigration Law Temporarily Blocked

To contact us Click HERE

Alabama immigration law on mobile homes blocked by judge

London Guardian

  • guardian.co.uk,
Rule that requires proof of citizenship when registering mobile homes 'leaves immigrants between a rock and a hard place'
A federal judge has temporarily blocked a part of Alabama's tough new immigration law that requires residents to show proof of citizenship when registering mobile homes with the state.


...Alabama requires owners of mobile homes to register those properties with the state or face three months in jail, but the new immigration law passed by the state legislature in June also bars illegal immigrants from submitting those registrations, Thompson wrote...link to complete article

Public Safety: Do you text while driving?

To contact us Click HERE

Did you know that texting while driving is as hazardous as driving drunk?  Did you know that talking on your cell phone while driving is almost as dangerous?  

It is amazing how many of my adult - highly educated friends and acquaintances drive and talk at the same time.  They tell me they are too busy to try and make phone calls from home or their office.  
As for texting and driving its much much more dangerous -- 
MTH
------------------------------

National Transportation Safety Board
Office of Public Affairs

No call, no text, no update behind the wheel: NTSB calls for nationwide ban on PEDs while driving


December 13, 2011

Following today's Board meeting on the 2010 multi-vehicle highway accident in Gray Summit, Missouri, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) called for the first-ever nationwide ban on driver use of personal electronic devices (PEDs) while operating a motor vehicle.
The safety recommendation specifically calls for the 50 states and the District of Columbia to ban the nonemergency use of portable electronic devices (other than those designed to support the driving task) for all drivers. The safety recommendation also urges use of the NHTSA model of high-visibility enforcement to support these bans and implementation of targeted communication campaigns to inform motorists of the new law and heightened enforcement....link to complete report
--------------------------------

Cellphone ban while driving? The tragedies behind the issue - December 13, 2011 |  3:28 pm - Los Angeles Times

Eleven texts in 11 minutes from behind the wheel -- then two were dead and 38 injured. A deadly Missouri incident was cited Tuesday by the National Transportation Safety Board as the panel urged a total ban on cellphone use while driving.

Such a ban (exceptions would be made for emergencies) would go far beyond what states now have in place. Currently, no state has a ban on all cellphone use by all drivers, according to the Governors Highway Safety Assn., although some prohibit cellphone use by certain drivers...link to complete article

Immigration: Alabama and Violations of the U.S. Constitution

To contact us Click HERE

Human Rights Watch accuses Alabama of violating constitution

Human Rights Watch says law HB56 breaches legal rights that apply to anyone regardless of their origin


  • guardian.co.uk,
  • [Human Rights Watch] ...recorded evidence of several cases of unauthorised immigrants who had wages withheld by employers and felt they were unable to take their grievance to court because of the new provision. One man, Alejandro, sought the advice of a lawyer but was told tha because of the new law he could not use the courts to retrieve the wages.

  • Immigration: Perry likes Arpaio, the Department of Justice doesn't

    To contact us Click HERE
    It is inconceivable that Texas Gov. Rick Perry would ally himself with Sheriff Arpaio just before a damning report on how Arpaio mistreats his inmates.

    Click HERE for the Department of Justice report

    HERE for the Department of Justice report in Spanish

    -----------------
    Pattern of civil rights abuses alleged in Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Maricopa County - LA Times

    The Justice Department charges that Latinos were illegally arrested and abused in jail repeatedly in the Arizona county and that hundreds of sexual assaults weren't investigated.


    ---------------
    Rick Perry turns to Joe Arpaio on Immigration Issue - LA Times
    Texas Gov. Rick Perry had hoped to assuage concerns about his views on illegal immigration by winning the backing of tough-talking Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Ariz.

    10 Ekim 2012 Çarşamba

    Romney Up 47-45 in Latest IBD/TIPP Tracking Poll

    To contact us Click HERE
    At IBD, "Romney Takes 2-Point Lead In IBD/TIPP Tracking Poll."

    IBD's polling was the most accurate during the 2008 election. It's clear by now that the Romney debate bounce is real and spectacular. And I'm getting the feeling his gains won't be ephemeral. The race has more than just tightened. It's now completely upended.

    R.S. McCain has more, "Expect the Unexpected: Why Liberals Suddenly Melted Down After the Debate."

    And linked there is AoSHQ just destroying little boy Nate Silver, especially on Twitter, "Nate Silver’s model predicts only 25% chance of Romney victory; Twitter predicts 100% chance of mockery."

    Check back for more ...

    RawMuscleGlutes: 'If you want cheering up, go read Kos...'

    To contact us Click HERE
    Andrew Sullivan's AIDS-related meltdown continues, "Obama's Implosion Update":

    WinningIf you want cheering up, go read Kos. He has some swing state polling that shows that the Obama free-fall may have stalled for a bit. I only note that in the poll of polls, Obama has now thrown away his leads in Florida and Virginia (Romney's now ahead), and is now only clinging on in Ohio, Wisconsin, and Colorado. Obama basically threw away six months of hard and smart campaigning in an interminable hour and a half. I've never seen a candidate do that before in my lifetime.

    And if a fast-backfiring Sesame Street ad was the Obama campaign's response to the implosion of last week, I'm not reassured. Seriously: after your entire agenda has been stolen from you by one of the most shameless con-men in politics on live TV, you decide that the way to come back is by playing the Big Bird card? That's why I'm worried.
    More at the link.

    And speaking of Daily Kos, the commie freaks have entered into a severe dissonance phase. Here's their own commissioned PPP survey, "Daily Kos/SEIU State of the Nation poll: Romney takes the lead in post-debate period." And then here's Markos Buttfreak himself, "Romney campaign: We're still losing."

    Right.

    More of the "shove reality down their throats" spin, I guess.

    IMAGE CREDIT: Reaganite.

    Labor Union Conflict-of-Interest Allegations Against Blue Shield of California

    To contact us Click HERE
    More union corruption, the freakin' commie thugs.

    At LAT, "Blue Shield's union ties raise concerns about conflicts":
    At a time when public-sector unions across the country are fighting to hold on to generous retirement and health benefits, one of the loudest voices standing up for their rights is Dave Low.

    A longtime labor activist, Low carries considerable clout as executive director of the California School Employees Assn., a 215,000-member union that represents bus drivers, custodians and other school workers. He also leads a broader group of 1.5 million government employees, including firefighters, police and teachers, called Californians for Health Care and Retirement Security.

    But Low had another job as well until recently. He was a consultant for Blue Shield of California, which has secured lucrative health insurance contracts that cover many of the same public workers that Low represents. His contract shows he was to be paid up to $125,000 a year for his work, which went from 2004 until Aug. 31.

    Low isn't the only person with union ties pulling double duty for Blue Shield. One of the insurance company's senior executives also works as a lobbyist for the Service Employees International Union, which represents nearly 300,000 government workers statewide.

    Experts say those close ties between Blue Shield and key labor unions may give the nonprofit company undue influence over multimillion-dollar insurance contracts for public employees. It's common in California for a joint panel of labor and management officials to pick the winning insurance bidders and set many of the terms.

    "This raises red flags about conflicts of interest and self-dealing," said Jessica Levinson, a Loyola Law School professor who studies public corruption. "It really starts to feel offensive when the public money at stake is so huge."

    A spokesman for the school union said it had approved of Low's contract with Blue Shield, and Low said he always put the interests of the union ahead of the insurer.

    Blue Shield and Low said there was nothing inappropriate about their relationship and that they've done nothing illegal or unethical. After The Times began asking questions about their relationship, the company ended Low's contract Aug. 31.

    Public employee benefits are coming under increasing scrutiny as municipalities, school districts and state governments face severe fiscal pressures and debates over what they can afford to offer rank-and-file workers. Health insurers compete vigorously for public-sector contracts because governments still provide some of the richest benefits among employers.

    One of the biggest prizes for any company is a contract with the California Public Employees' Retirement System, the country's third-largest healthcare buyer after the federal government and General Motors Co. It spends $7 billion annually on medical care for active and retired state and local government workers.

    CalPERS is a crucial customer for Blue Shield, which serves about 400,000 of CalPERS' 1.3 million members. Overall, the San Francisco company has about 3.3 million customers and nearly $10 billion in annual revenue.

    In August, CalPERS began the process for choosing new healthcare companies, and it plans to award three-year contracts next year that take effect in 2014. Many of the industry's biggest players — UnitedHealth Group Inc., WellPoint Inc. and Aetna Inc. — are competing with Blue Shield.

    Blue Shield's contracts with Low, obtained by The Times, show that it was paying him for information and advice about dealing with CalPERS' board members and agency staff. Low was hired to "advise and assist Blue Shield in gaining CalPERS board and constituent support for key initiatives and proposals" and to "assist Blue Shield in its efforts to expand interactions with key decision makers and influencers of other non-CalPERS contracting public agencies."

    In an interview, Low described his duties differently. Low, 55, said his primary role with Blue Shield was to monitor its service to union members and to alert the company about any problems CalPERS board members shared with him. He said he wasn't privy to any inside information about healthcare contracts and that it wasn't his job "to sell their product."

    "I will challenge anybody to come up with a single instance in which I acted in an unethical manner," he said. "I've never had inappropriate conversations or contacts with Blue Shield or CalPERS."

    Tom Epstein, vice president of public affairs for Blue Shield, said the company employed Low to provide "strategic political consulting." Epstein declined to comment further on Low's work or his recent departure.
    Yeah, the dude declined to comment alright. He'll be taking the fifth in no time.

    More at the link.

    Long Beach Press-Telegram: Yes on 32

    To contact us Click HERE
    I'm glad to see it.

    "Endorsement: Yes on Proposition 32 -- Unions have inordinate amount of power in state politics":
    To understand the need for Proposition 32, all a voter has to do is look at the the vast sums of cash pouring into the campaign against it. A total of more than $50 million has been donated to the "yes" and "no" campaigns. Of that, the vast majority has gone to fund advertising for the "no" side. And of that, most has come from unions representing California teachers and other public employees.

    This is an example of the financial power that gives unions outsized political influence everywhere from election campaigns to the halls of the state Legislature and local city halls, too often resulting in laws that benefit union members over the interests of all Californians.

    Now California voters have a chance to rein in that power. They should not miss the opportunity on Nov. 6. The editorial board urges passage of Proposition 32.

    The measure would do three things: It would ban donations to state and local candidates by unions and corporations. It would ban the political use of money deducted from paychecks by unions or corporations. And it would ban government contractors from contributing to the campaigns of public officials who control the awarding of those contracts.

    The measure's well-funded opponents complain that it would affect labor interests more than business interests -- because businesses don't use payroll deductions in the same way as unions, and because companies that aren't corporations are exempt from the proposition.

    But the proponents don't pretend they're aiming for balance in the proposal. They want to curb the influence of unions over the decisions of state lawmakers, which has been out of balance for years.

    That is a cause that this page has supported for a long time. We endorsed 2005's Proposition 75 and 1998's Proposition 226, which would have required unions to get individual members' permission before spending dues money on politics. (Those propositions lost by 8 percent and 6 percent, respectively.)

    The arguments then are no less valid now.

    Recent examples of Big Labor's influence in Sacramento include the power it has exerted over pension reform and prison issues. Another egregious example that arose this summer was a bill considered by the Assembly Education Committee to make it easier for school districts to fire teachers accused of terrible crimes involving sex, violence or drugs.

    Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla of Pacoima had introduced the bill in the wake of several child sex-abuse cases in Los Angeles schools. The bill passed the Senate with bipartisan support. It had popular support.

    But the California Teachers Association bused in members to confront the key Assembly committee, underscoring its arguments for protecting the job security of teachers with a not-so-subtle reminder of the union's 800-pound-gorilla influence. Enough committee members voted against the bill to kill it.
    They bused in thugs. That's what they always do.

    More at the link.

    San Antonio Military Base Used as Children's Shelter

    To contact us Click HERE
    Due to an increase in the number of unaccompanied minors crossing the border into the U.S., a San Antonio Air Force base has been turned into a shelter to house the children.  According to the article below, the majority of the children are from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras.  A smaller number of the children are from Mexico.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/18/immigrant-children-air-force-base-shelter_n_1431584.html?1334749309&ref=latino-voices

    9 Ekim 2012 Salı

    San Antonio Military Base Used as Children's Shelter

    To contact us Click HERE
    Due to an increase in the number of unaccompanied minors crossing the border into the U.S., a San Antonio Air Force base has been turned into a shelter to house the children.  According to the article below, the majority of the children are from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras.  A smaller number of the children are from Mexico.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/18/immigrant-children-air-force-base-shelter_n_1431584.html?1334749309&ref=latino-voices

    Becoming Legal: An Immigrant's Path to Citizenship

    To contact us Click HERE
    A short course on immigration in the USA:

    1.  Anti-immigrant sentiment is nothing new nor limited to our current affairs or just the U.S.:  all over the world immigrants are shunned and the outside ethnic group is always seen as inferior.  Just a few which come to mind:  Shiite and Sunni,  Japanese and Chinese, Kurds and Turks, Slavs and Croats, Romanians in Spain ( the Spanish gov. recently was offering them money to go back to Romania, if they promised to stay there for 5 yrs ! ), Catholic Irish vs. English Protestants, the Algerians in France etc.  In the US we have historically found groups that were easy to discriminate against:  Native Americans, Italians, Germans, Irish, Chinese, Japanese, Africans, and now Latinos.
        2. There is always an element of "otherness" commonly based on religion or skin color or language in the "outside" group.    3.  Those in a position of influence ( talk show hosts, politicians, religious leaders, and in some cases even teachers) tend to take sides.  Those who exacerbate the dislike of the scapegoat, usually focus on the "otherness" and try to foment fear of the unknown.  Most people naturally have certain fears of that which is outside their comfort zone, their realm of familiarity.  So, this is an easy way to persuade the populace of the demons in "those people."   We hear terms like "the axis of evil," and "They are either for us, or against us." or "They are taking away our jobs."  This is a common one in our current financially stressful world.    4.  With the passage of time, at least in the US, our "social mind-set" or popular image softens toward many of our formerly disliked groups.  Think of the changes we have seen in attitudes in our lifetime toward, say, African Americans, Japanese, and the Vietnamese.  These changes come slowly, with influence makers and moms in sneakers speaking out.     5.  Seeing the above pattern repeat itself several times in our lives, we now are much more skeptical of accepting the initial demagoguery.    6.  Based on our own experiences and observations, we have found the hispanics we have met here in the US and Latin America, mostly genuine, generous, hard-working people, who are trying to make the best of their lives.  The newly emigrated are leaving poverty, violence and corruption, looking for a new beginning, a second chance.  When we recently read in an internet forum a comment from a woman who described herself as a conservative, born again Christian who thought that all Mexicans should be deported, what came to mind was that the essence of both Christianity and immigration is a second chance, a new beginning, an opportunity to start fresh.  She obviously saw life differently from us.
        7.  Attempts to force immigrants out of our communities have repeatedly proven unworkable.  The resulting economic impact is disastrous to those on both sides of the tracks.  The citizen farmers and small business owners find themselves without customers and workers.  The immigrants, both legal and illegal, have their lives and families thrown into chaos.  For some, this may be the goal.  For us, it is unfathomable.    8.  So, indeed, we would favor changing our laws to provide a path to citizenship.  Perhaps fines may be a part of the equation, but few will be able to pay them.  If it is found that back taxes are owed, certainly employers would be required to pay their portions, along with penalties and interest.  We think that it will be nearly impossible to find small business employers who have relied in the past on undocumented workers, now willing to step up and pay these back taxes, fines and interest.  Hence, "making up for the past" is a difficult part of the solution.  Criminal records should be examined and not allowed for violent crimes.  Service to the country (USA) in the form of work in the Peace Corps, Americorps etc would be a good thing.  Basic English proficiency should be required, as well as knowledge of our governmental system.  We see this not as amnesty.  Rather it represents a means of earning a way into our system.  In the early days of our country, many people earned their way in - as indentured servants.  When they could not pay for their passage across the ocean, they "borrowed" the money from a landowner already living in this country, then worked for that owner for five to seven years without pay.  Hence, working to achieve legal status and citizenship in the US is nothing new.

    Alabama's Attorney General makes claims about "Illegal Aliens"

    To contact us Click HERE

    Alabama Attorney General, Luther Strange, testifying before Congress. Photo by lutherstrange.

    Excerpts from the Immigration Impact by Wendy Sefsaf
    Oct 12, 2011

     CLAIM:     Yesterday, Alabama’s Attorney General claimed that “illegal aliens” make up a substantial portion of the state’s prison population.
       FACT:   Alabama's prison population: 31,000  --   182 of which are currently subject to deportation based on holds placed by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.  That is about 1/2 of one percent.

        CLAIM:     Yesterday, Alabama’s Attorney General claimed “many of these people are taking jobs away from United States citizens."
         FACT:         Alabamas unemployment rate hovers around 10%.   To say that one undocumented worker fired is one documented worker hired might be politically expedient, but the research actually shows just the opposite. Undocumented workers tend to have different skills, education, and experience levels than native-born workers. In fact, if a 1 to 1 worker replacement was the answer, why is the Governor considering using the prison population to alleviate a severe worker shortage on Alabama farms? Where are all those unemployed Americans waiting to work in the fields?

       CLAIM:     The Alabama’s Attorney General claims there are "difficulties in collecting taxes from these persons ["illegal aliens"], many of whom work off the books, means that many of them are utilizing Alabama’s public resources without paying their fair share.”
        FACT:      According to the Institute on Tax and Economic Policy, undocumented immigrants in Alabama pay $25 million in income taxes, $5.8 million in property taxes, and $98 million in sales taxes, for a total contribution of more than $130 million.

     The actual costs to Alabama’s economy have yet to be determined, and no real estimates have been provided by the lawmakers behind HB56. It has always been the case that estimating the costs and contributions of unauthorized immigrants is not an exact science. But Alabama is about to make it a bit easier. No longer will losing your undocumented population be an abstract proposition. In Alabama it’s about to be a reality, and with it the economic ramifications of a mass exodus of workers, consumers, and taxpayers from an already struggling state economy.

    See more from the source:  http://immigrationimpact.com/2011/10/12/the-facts-and-numbers-don%e2%80%99t-matter-in-alabama/

    Mexico's Movement for Peace and Justice - Caravan

    To contact us Click HERE


    The CIP Americas Program--along with some 100 partner organizations of migrants, churches, unions, students, NGOs and community members in the cities along the route--is helping to organize caravan events and give voice to the victims of the drug war. We will be accompanying the caravan on part of its long journey through the country and providing daily blogs, articles and interviews as events unfold.
    A handful of U.S. companies that produce weapons and defense and intelligence equipment are raking in taxpayer dollars in government contracts for the drug war, while in Mexico more than 70,000 people have died since the war was launched in December 2006.
    Today the face of the U.S. government in Mexico is the face of war. This face is reflected in the vast expansion of joint security operations and direct intervention in Mexico´s counter-narcotics planning and operations. Instead of schools and hospitals, our tax dollars support military helicopters and espionage systems.
    The relationship between the two nations has degenerated into a seemingly endless war on drugs. The war is commanded from the north, where enforcing prohibition is considered more important than human lives, and fought in the south, where the long arm of enforcement has left 70,000 dead in the past six years.
    Despite tragically negative results, the U.S. government has dismissed calls from citizens in both countries to end the war on drugs and the misguided Merida Initiativethat supports it. Instead, we continue on a path that throws U.S. youth behind the bars of lucrative private prisons and feeds defense companies by perpetuating violent conflict in Mexico.
    Family members of the thousands murdered, disappeared, attacked and displaced in Mexico’s drug war and their supporters will present a very different, human, face of binational relations. They will meet with families in the United States that have suffered senseless incarceration and violence as a result of criminalizing drugs, rather than supporting communities and individuals to manage the health and social threats posed by consumption and addiction.

    Find out what organizations are planning in your community. You are needed to help out with organization of events and logistics for the peace caravan. Please plan to attend the events. Learn first-hand the human costs of the drug war and find out how to make change from your own community on up to the national and international levels.
    Here is the caravan schedule. For more information on events in your community, see the caravan website. To volunteer for upcoming caravan events, please write us at:info@cipamericas.org
    SCHEDULE:
    San Diego, CA - Aug 12 SUN
    Los Angeles, CA - Aug 13- Aug 14 MON/TUES
    Phoenix, AZ - Aug 15 WED
    Tucson, AZ - Aug 16 THURS
    Las Cruces, NM - Aug 17 FRI
    Albuquerque/Santa Fe, NM - Aug 18 SAT
    Santa Fe, NM - Aug 19 SUN
    El Paso, TX - Aug 21 TUES
    Laredo, TX- Aug 22, WED
    Harlingen/Brownsville, TX - Aug 23 THURS
    McAllen/San Antonio, TX - Aug 24 FRI
    Austin, TX - Aug 25 SAT
    Houston, TX - Aug 26 SUN
    New Orleans, LA - Aug 27 MON
    (Rest Day – Aug 28 TUES)
    Montgomery, AL – Aug 29 WED
    Atlanta, GA – Aug 30 - 31 THURS/FRI
    Cleveland, OH -Sept 5 WED
    New York, NY – Sept 6-7 THURS/FRI
    Baltimore, MD - Sept 8-9 SAT/ SUN
    Washington, D.C. - Sept 10-12 MON-WED - FINAL CITY
    For More Information:
    • Caravan for Peace with Justice and Dignity web site:http://www.caravanforpeace.org/caravan
    • Global Exchange,  Co-Organizer of the Peace Caravanhttp://www.globalexchange.org/mexico/caravan
    • Invitation to join the Peace Caravan here.
    • Movement for Peace with Justice and Dignity's website (Spanish)
    • Sign up to volunteer with the caravan by using this registration form.

    Barack Obama dedicates National Historic Site to César Chávez

    To contact us Click HERE


    The historic visit today of Barack Obamato La Paz and the dedication of the Cesar Chavez monument as a nationalhistoric site is important.  It iscovered in many news stories, including here:  http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/The-Vote/2012/1008/In-dedicating-Cesar-Chavez-monument-Obama-reaches-out-to-Latino-votersUnfortunately the writer AmandaPaulson  is poorly informed on therole of Chavez and the UFW on immigration.  She repeats the right wing view that Chavez was antiimmigrant.  Nothing could befurther from the truth. Both CNN and USA Today cover thededication today. Among the more contested issuesraised by Paulson  and by Barnacke  in Trampling Out the Vintage, is the  view of the UFW’s relationships withundocumented workers in  1975  period, the so called “Wet Line.   This is the same argumentbeing  made today by various  anti immigrant militia groups , TeaParty advocates and  posted onWikipedia . I tried for a couple of weeks to correct the Wikipedia source butothers regularly changed it back.  The post cites sources, but the sources only acknowledge a conflict,they do not support the assertion of anti immigrant behavior. I prefer Bert Corona’s.   Bert was a leading voice onimmigration  issues and organizedundocumented workers in the  organization Hemandad Mexicana.  He was also a friend of mine, and we worked together onimmigration issues.  Althoughcritical of the UFW policy, Bert never took the highly destructive view that the militia advocates promotetoday.  There were disputes overissues, and errors were  made butremember the context, which Bert for one did.   The UFW waslosing the strike  as strikers  were replaced by  with undocumented workers crossing aborder and a picket line to work in struck fields. These undocumented workers,who knew little or nothing about the UFW or the long, violent, bitter andcostly strike  they were breaking,were nonetheless  breaking a strikeon  a  movement for justice and equality.
                Chavezwas not anti immigrant.  Indeed,from its founding the UFW was an organization that worked to improve the livesof immigrants, providing education, immigration counseling, and organizing.   Helping workers toget legal status was a major part of the work.  The case cited was not about immigrants, it was about strikebreakers. Ultimately in 1975  the  UFW convention took  a formal position to organize the undocumented and to allowthem to vote in elections as a part of the California Agricultural RelationsAct. That is  the official UFWposition on the undocumented.   

    8 Ekim 2012 Pazartesi

    From Tijuana: Ex-Dreamer Calls for Immigration Reform

    To contact us Click HERE

    From Tijuana, Ex-Dreamer Calls for Immigration ReformPosted on 28 August 2012By Jacqueline Guzmán-Garcia, Translated by Elena Shore
    Photo: Nancy Landa at graduation
    Nancy Landa was working in the public sector at a California organization that fateful September in 2009, when she was 29. She had graduated with honors in 2004 with a degree in business administration from California State University, Northridge (CSUN), and had a steady job. Everything seemed normal.
    All of a sudden, at the Third Street entrance to Highway 710 N toward Long Beach, Landa was stopped by two immigration officials. They got out of a van and, without showing her any official documentation, told her she was under arrest.
    “I’m dreaming -- it’s a nightmare,” Landa thought as she climbed in the vehicle with four other people, heading to a detention center in downtown Los Angeles.
    “I knew in that moment that what I had built in the United States, my life, was over. It was hard to take in what happened next,” she said.
    Obama's Deportation Record
    Without knowing it, Landa and her family, who were also deported after this incident, became yet another statistic, four of the more than 1.2 million people who have been deported since 2009, estimated by the Pew Hispanic Center. Under President Barack Obama, more people have been deported each year than under any other president in U.S. history.
    In spite of this, on June 15, President Obama announced the establishment of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) plan for young people who, like Landa, were brought to the United States as children. DACA is expected to benefit about 1.4 million young people. However, young people Landa’s age will not qualify, since deferred action is limited to those who were under 31 years old as of June 15, 2012.

    Landa, her parents and her younger brother emigrated from Mexico to the United States when she was nine years old. She grew up in South Central Los Angeles and as a result of her good grades was able to go to Pacific Palisades Charter School.
    “Being in high school, I knew I had the challenge of going to college because I was undocumented,” she said. “My parents didn’t have the money to pay for it.”
    As a result of her exceptional performance in school, she won the prestigious "Gates Millenium" award, but then learned that she could not receive the scholarship because of her immigration status.
    “They asked me to fill out information for FAFSA [Free Application for Federal Student Aid] and I couldn’t do it,” she explained. “That scholarship would have paid for all my college expenses.”
    Despite this, Landa finished high school with honors in 1998, graduating with a top-level grade-point average. She applied for other scholarships from private organizations and started college at CSUN that year.
    In 2003 she became the first Latina -- and second undocumented -- student president of CSUN. The university’s first undocumented student president was Vladimir Cerna (1996-97), a student from El Salvador, who announced his immigration status in the middle of the controversy over California’s Prop 187, the anti-immigrant ballot measure passed in 1994.
    Life Seemed Perfect
    While Landa was pursuing her college career, her parents were trying to resolve the family’s immigration status. In a stroke of luck, they managed to get work permits for themselves and their two children.
    Landa got her first work permit two months after graduating from CSUN, and life seemed perfect. She started working in the public sector, managing educational initiatives and economic and labor development.
    However, her happiness was short lived. She wasn’t able to renew her visa, even though the notary in charge of her family’s case had charged them $5,000 for the process. That was when immigration authorities arrested her as she approached the freeway.
    “I managed to send a text to a friend, asking her to let my parents know,” Landa remembers. “Later [the immigration agents] took my purse, my cell phone, all official documents and kept them.”
    “I couldn’t believe it,” says Karla V. Salazar, Landa’s friend who received the text message. “Immediately a group of friends started calling different pro-immigrant organizations and friends who could give us advice. Unfortunately, we weren’t able to prevent her deportation.”
    In a moment of desperation, Landa’s parents decided to call the notary, thinking that she could help resolve the case. But Landa had doubts about her honesty. “I knew I couldn’t trust her because it was thanks to her that I was there,” she said.
    Landa, who said she never saw the deportation order, suspects the notary applied for political asylum for the whole family. However, authorities couldn’t find enough proof showing the Landas were in “extreme danger” and would qualify. Instead of getting legal status, they received a deportation order.
    Without being able to do anything about it, Landa’s world took a 180-degree turn in eight short hours. At the detention center, she was fingerprinted and put in a cell.
    “They lock you up in there with everyone,” Landa says. “I spent like eight hours there.”
    She recalled, “The immigration official told me I didn’t have any choice, they already had the judge’s order, and that same day they were going to kick me out of the country.”
    Landa managed to call her parents. When she told them they were taking her to Tijuana that day, her parents said they had spoken with the notary and had paid her more money for help. But Landa knew the notary had no legal recourse to stop her deportation. “I told my parents not to pay that lady anything,” she said, convinced the notary was lying.
    A few minutes later, Landa was put on a bus headed to Tijuana.
    “I Was Scared”
    “I was scared. I didn’t know what Tijuana was like,” she says. “I knew it was very dangerous. I didn’t know how I would reach my friends. And I didn’t know what to do, where I was going to stay. I was worried because I didn’t have any answers.”
    When she got to Tijuana, they returned her belongings to her and handed her the deportation order, which said she couldn’t enter the United States for another 10 years.
    Salazar and three other friends got together to help Landa.
    “I’m Nicaraguan and I remembered how scared I was as a child crossing the Central American border with Mexico and the U.S.-Mexico border,” Salazar said. “I couldn’t turn my back on Nancy. I prayed to all the saints, I prayed to God and there was no turning back.”
    Salazar’s greatest fear was what might happen to her friend at night, left by herself and not knowing anyone.
    “As a woman, a mother and an immigrant, it broke my heart to know that Nancy had been abandoned on the border like garbage, regardless of all of her achievements and contributions,” she said.
    The group of friends took Landa to a relative’s house in Tijuana.
    “They let me stay there for a few days,” Landa says. “The next weekend [my friends] came back to visit me and they collected donations to cover my living costs.”
    It wasn’t too long before Landa was able to get her savings from Los Angeles to support herself.
    In Tijuana, Landa contacted attorney Nikhil Shah, whom she had met at a MALDEF event in Los Angeles. She wanted to reopen her case, even if they might lose, but her first goal was to report the notary who had committed fraud.
    “I wanted to document the notary’s fraud,” says Landa, “because if you check all my documents, there is no information from the notary, because she filled out the paperwork in a way that looks like I had done it myself, without any legal advice.”
    In October 2009, her parents and her brother were also deported to Tijuana. William Landa, her brother, was arrested at work, and her parents were taken from their home at 5:30 in the morning.
    “My parents lived with other undocumented people,” Landa said. “Immigration didn’t have a deportation order for their neighbors, but since they were all living together and they were all undocumented, they were all handcuffed and taken away.”
    Know Your Rights
    Landa added that’s why it’s important for undocumented immigrants to know their rights: “It’s obvious that [U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement] is not following the proper process.”
    Landa’s lawyer, Shah, said that as a result of the notary’s fraud, the options available for his client to adjust her immigration status are very limited.
    Shah continued, “In general, the penalty is 10 years for deportees before they can return home.”
    “The only ones who can return are undocumented immigrants who are married to U.S. citizens or whose parents are U.S. citizens or legal residents . . . and they fill out a letter saying the U.S.-citizen relative could suffer extreme hardship if the undocumented immigrant does not return.”
    Landa’s situation doesn’t qualify her for this kind of hardship waiver.
    Three years have passed since her deportation and even though she is in her native country, she said the problem of being undocumented still haunts her.
    “My work options are limited because if I have to go to the United States, I can’t,” she said. “I can’t get a work visa, let alone a tourist visa to be able to go shopping on the other side of the border.”
    When Landa heard about Obama’s deferred action plan, she decided to write letter to the president to tell him about the injustice of U.S. immigration laws.
    “We aren’t criminals,” stressed Landa. “It isn’t fair to kick us out of the country for so many years.”
    “The reality is that under your administration, deportation of non‐criminal undocumented immigrants has increased and has contributed to more family separations than during the eight years of the George W. Bush presidency,” Landa writes in her letter to the president.
    “The failure to take action earlier has irreversibly impacted the lives of hundreds of immigrants that are thrown out of the U.S. on a daily basis,” she adds.
    “I and my family are among that number,” Landa’s letter goes on. If deferred action had been established earlier, there would have been fewer deportations of outstanding Dreamer students like her.
    Landa’s letter to President Obama proposes that the U.S. government to consider the following options:
    Increasing accountability of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency and their deportation procedures;
    Removing the 10‐year ban for deportees so they can successfully appeal their cases;
    Reforming the visa process so deportees who are working in their country of origin and are required to travel to the United States for business purposes are not ineligible for a visitor’s visa.
    Landa said she is still adapting to a country that remains foreign to her. She hopes that the United States will enact immigration reform soon so that the 12 million undocumented people living here won’t have to suffer an abrupt deportation like she did.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    This article, which first appeared on New America Media, is a translation of the Spanish-language original published on El Nuevo Sol.
    ShareThis
    Source URL: http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/site/tijuana-ex-dreamer-calls-immigration-reform